CORY.



An informal straw poll has indicated that three people understand the reference. I am okay with that.

EMAIL | AIM | Archive | RSS


Follow me:

Facebook
Last.FM
Twitter

FREQUENTLY READ.

Choire Sicha
College Callgirl
Elyse Sewell
Four Four
Gawker
Jezebel
Marina
Matthew R Smith
Noelle Hancock
Oh No They Didn't
Public School Intelligentsia
Rachel

FOLLOWED TUMBLRS.




Posted 2 years ago on October 14 2009


Permalink

We have standardized every other unit in commerce except the most important and universal unit of all, the unit of purchasing power. What business man would consent for a moment to make a contract in terms of yards of cloth or tons of coal, and leave the size of the yard or the ton to chance? … We have standardized even our new units of electricity, the ohm, the kilowatt, the ampere, and the volt. But the dollar is still left to the chances of gold mining [Fisher, 1913].
There is probably no defect in the world’s economic organization today more serious than the fact that we use as our unit of value, not a thing with a fixed value, but a fixed weight of gold with a wildly varying value. In a little less than a half century here in the United States, we have seen our yard-stick of value, namely, the value of a gold dollar, exhibit the following gyrations: from 1879 to 1896 it rose 27%. From 1896 to 1920 it fell 70%. From 1920 to September, 1927, it rose 56%. If, figuratively speaking, we say that the yard-stick of value was thirty-six inches long in 1879 when the United States returned to the gold standard, then it was forty-six inches long in 1896, thirteen and a half inches long in 1920 and is twenty-one inches long today (Professor E. W. Kemmerer at a meeting of the Stable Money Association, December, 1927, quoted in Fisher [1928).
[From Shafir, Diamond, and Tversky’s “Money Illusion” in the May 1997 Quarterly Journal of Economics]
Fuck, I love the bizarre amalgamation of social sciences that is my major.


Comments (View)

Powered by tumblr. Theme by Scott. download this theme.